2013年江苏高考模式_2013江苏高考题

08年之前是2003年的最难，只有2003年，150分的卷子平均分在50左右。从08年以后来看。江苏数学卷2012、2010年都是比较难的，然后2011、2008年是难度中等偏上的，2009、2013、2015、2017是难度中等偏下的，2014、2018年是很简单的。

其实在2003年高考时，不只是江苏省，而是全国的数学卷都是“史诗级”难度：因为在高考前四川南充的考生张博，在原本能考上普通高校的情况下**了高考试卷，使得全国的高考数学卷都换成了备用卷，因而难度大大提升了。

江苏卷数学难的原因：

1、高考数学没有选择题

江苏的高考数学是没有选择题的。江苏卷直接上来先给你14个填空题热热身，或许在题干的难度上，2019江苏卷填空题并不比其它省份选择题难多少，但是没有选项可以排除，不会或者答错就是零没有猜对的25%几率。

选择题和填空题的答题难度可谓是天壤之别，有时候填空比解答题还要难，因为解答题起码还有个过程分，而填空题只看结果。

在高考总分只有480的江苏，5分可以说显得更为珍贵，以2018年理科为例，南京大学投档线为391，而东南大学为388，南京理工大学投档线378，可以说各层次高校之间的差距也就是一两道填空题的距离。

2、理科大题难度大，选做题分值低

但是由于填空题和选择题的差别，留给大题的时间至少少了10分钟肯定是有的，江苏大题分值较高，大多都为14分~16分，最要命的是解题步骤都较为繁琐。

14分值的有两个问题，16分值的有三个问题，为了2分多出一个难度大的问题，真是拼了。今年的第一个选修题可以说比较良心，送分题。

最后的压轴选修题可以说是难度大分值少（10分），大家可以去搜一下标准答案，光是看着标准答案理清头绪都得半天，10分题的难度丝毫不比16分的低。

3、知识点贴近大学数学

一般中学数学的了解知识难点，在江苏都是必须掌握的知识，看了江苏高考数学卷，真的不少题目就是大学才能看到的高数、线代和概率统计的结合体。

向量、各种曲线、导数、矩阵变换及特征值、极坐标、随机变量等知识点各种相互组合。难度最大的是江苏数学后面大题朝着一种综合分析问题的方向走，比如第18题的解答中，光是点P和Q的位置讨论就进行了多次，考察的就是针对问题，看你能不能考虑全面，稍有不慎就会漏掉某种情况。

就是不知道具体判题赋分是怎样的，假如前两问能得到10分以上，我就把第三问留着最后做，因为付出与收获实在不成正比。

PASSAGE? D

Mark Twain has been called the inventor of the American novel. And he surely deserves additional praise: the man who popularized the clever literary attack on racism.

I say clever because anti-slavery fiction had been the important part of theliterature in the years before the Civil War. H. B. Stowe’s Uncle Tom’s Cabin is only the most famous example. These early stories dealt directly with slavery. With minor exceptions, Twain planted his attacks on slavery and prejudice into tales that were on the surface about something else entirely. He drew his readers into the argument by drawing them into the story.

Again and again, in the postwar years, Twain seemed forced to deal with the challenge of race. Consider the most controversial, at least today, of Twain’s novels, Adventures of Huckleberry Finn. Only a few books have been kicked off the shelves as often as Huckleberry Finn, Twains most widely read tale. Once upon a time, people hated the book because it struck them as rude. Twain himself wrote that those who banned the book considered the novel “trash and suitable only for the slums (贫民窟).” More recently the book has been attacked because of the character Jim, the escaped slave, and many occurences of the word nigger. (The term Nigger Jim, for which the novel is often severely criticized, never appears in it.)

But the attacks were and are silly—and miss the point. The novel is strongly anti-slavery. Jim’s search through the slave states for the family from whom he has been forcibly parted is heroic. As J. Chadwick has pointed out, the character of Jim was a first in American fiction—a recognition that the slave had two personalities, “the voice of survival within a white slave culture and the voice of the individual: Jim, the father and the man.”

There is much more. Twain’s mystery novel Pudd’nhead Wilson stood as a challenge to the racial beliefs of even many of the liberals of his day.?Written at a time when the accepted wisdom held Negroes to be inferior (低等的)?to whites, especially in intelligence, Twain’s tale centered in part around two babies switched at birth. A slave gave birth to her master’s baby and, for fear that the child should be sold South, switched him for the master’s baby by his wife. The slave’s light-skinned child was taken to be white and grew up with both the attitudes and the education of the slave-holding class. The master’s wife’s baby was taken for black and grew up with the attitudes and intonations of the slave.

The point was difficult to miss: nurture (养育), not nature, was the key to social status. The features of the black man that provided the stuff of prejudice—manner of speech, for example—were, to Twain, indicative of nothing other than the conditioning that slavery forced on its victims.

Twain’s racial tone was not perfect. One is left uneasy, for example, by the lengthy passage in his autobiography (自传) about how much he loved what were called “nigger shows” in his youth—mostly with white men performing in black-face—and his delight in getting his mother to laugh at them. Yet there is no reason to think Twain saw the shows as representing reality. His frequent attacks on slavery and prejudice suggest his keen awareness that they did not.

Was Twain a racist? Asking the question in the 21st century is as wise as asking the same of Lincoln. If we read the words and attitudes of the past through the “wisdom” of the considered moral judgments of the present, we will find nothing but error.?Lincoln, who believed the black manthe inferior of the white, fought and won a war to free him. And Twain, raised in a slave state, briefly a soldier, and inventor of Jim, may have done more to anger the nation over racial injustice and awaken its collective conscience than any other novelist in the past century.

65. How do Twain’s novels on slavery differ from Stowe’s?

A. Twain was more willing to deal with racism.

B. Twain’s attack on racism was much less open.

C. Twain’s themes seemed to agree with plots.

66. Recent criticism of Adventures of Huckleberry Finn arose partly from its _____.

A. target readers at the bottom

B. anti-slavery attitude

C. rather impolite language

D. frequent use of “nigger”

67. What best proves Twain’s anti-slavery stand according to the author?

A. Jim’s search for his family was described in detail.

B. The slave’s voice was first heard in American novels.

C. Jim grew up into a man and a father in the white culture.

D. Twain suspected that the slaves were less intelligent.

68. The story of two babies switched mainly indicates that _____.

A. slaves were forced to give up their babies to their masters

B. slaves’ babies could pick up slave-holders’ way of speaking

C. blacks’ social position was shaped by how they were brought up

D. blacks were born with certain features of prejudice

69. What does the underlined word “they” in Paragraph 7 refer to?

A. The attacks.

B. Slavery and prejudice.

C. White men.

D. The shows.

70. What does the author mainly argue for?

A. Twain had done more than his contemporary writers to attack racism.

B. Twain was an admirable figure comparable to Abraham Lincoln.

C. Twain’s works had been banned on unreasonable grounds.

D. Twain’s works should be read from a historical point of view.